UK Govt “Snatches” Zimbabwean Boy From Mother
6 August 2015
Spread the love

The British government is under fire for taking away into their “care” a 15 year old troublesome Zimbabwean boy from his mother who were flying past London en route to Harare, in a case that has sent shockwaves in the Zim diaspora community there, as the boy took advantage of the British police system by saying that he does not like his home country, Zimbabwe.
What further irked Zimbabweans was the fact that the Zimbabwean and Canadian embassies were not informed on time of the actions taken by UK. The boy has both Zimbabwean and Canadian citizenship.
Families this week blew their horn in online protests after the lad, an offspring of a well known South African religious leader, was taken into British care even though he has no UK residency and was in transit past the island country to Harare. Current legal guidelines until this week barred British social workers from taking the children of foreigners into care.
What shocked the Zimbabwean community was the fact that there is now a legal precedent which empowers foreign children to obtain an easy way to live on British taxpayer funds.
The lad, whose identity cannot be disclosed due to his age, was traveling back to Zimbabwe in March when upon arriving in the UK, he sought police help claiming that his mother was abusing him by forcing him to return to Zimbabwe.
Investigations showed that contrary to claims of abuse raised by the 15 year old, the lad actually has a posh life as is also enrolled at Harare’s expensive Eaglesvale Secondary School.
Police investigations which cleared the mother of any wrong doing also found the boy was a trouble maker in Switzerland, where he lived for over a year. It was unearthed that there is no case whatsoever against the mother as boy had earlier claimed to British police. Court documents reflect that at that tender age, he is now not only a habitual cannabis drug taker, but a trouble maker.
The Father together with the known church leader(grandfather), have not played any part in the child’s life and not been notified of these proceedings, the court found.
There was no order or determination made that the mother is incapable of taking  care of her child other than the decision to uphold the lad’s protest that he does not want to return to Harare.
But last week’s interim order stated that the lad is now placed in the care of the London Borough of Sutton until the finalisation of the proceedings or further order.  The verdict read in part:
 

  1. EXPERTS
  1. An application was made for the instruction of an expert in Canadian Law relating to the potential placement of the lad in a kinship placement in Alberta.
  1. The local authority shall take the lead in instructing a lawyer qualified in the state of Alberta to advise on the legality of placement options for the child in Canada in the event that the court makes a care order or supervision order or special guardianship order or child arrangement order in favour of the sister and to advise on whether mirror orders can be obtained and the legal procedure to do this.
  1. the local authority shall take the lead on the instruction on 7 August 2015
  1. the local authority shall dispatch the agreed letter of instruction by 4pm on 11 August 2015
  1. Such advice to be filed and served by 4pm on 24 September 2015.

 
 

  1. OTHER ORDERS

 

  1. The respondent mother the mother’s application in her letter dated 30 July 2015 to discharge the order of 21 May 2015 and any other court related order is hereby refused.
  1. The need for the local authority to file and serve a formal part 25 compliant application in respect of the instruction of an expert in Canadian law be dispensed with

 

  1. The Local authority is to use their best endeavours to serve notice of these proceedings on the Father, (Name Withheld) by 4pm on 27 August 2015, such notice to include service of the application, case summaries filed by the local authority, position statements filed on behalf of the Child’s Guardian, orders made by the court and contact details for the local authority solicitor. Permission for substituted service of notice of these proceedings and the above documents via the father’s lawyers in South Africa.

 

  1. In the event that the Father wishes to take part in these proceedings he shall contact the Local Authority forthwith and, if so advised, shall seek an urgent directions appointment which the Court shall list as a matter of urgency.

 

  1. The time for the Local Authority, as holders of parental responsibility for the lad under an interim care order, to apply for a replacement passport for the lad from the Canadian Embassy in London is extended to 4.00pm on 3 August 2015. Upon issue the London Borough of Sutton shall hold the replacement passport for the boy until further order.

 

  1. The Local authority shall file and serve a kinship assessment on the child’s sister who is in Canada, known as a Home Study Report, such assessment to be filed no later than by 4pm on 5 November 2015. This assessment shall either be completed by a local authority social worker employee or agent of the London Borough of Sutton working in co-operation with Alberta Social Services, such assessment to be agreed in advance with the Alberta social services and Canadian Central authority. In the event that such agreement is not forthcoming by 4pm on 10 August 2015, the London Borough of Sutton shall instruct CFAB Child and Families Across Borders to complete the Home Study Report.

 

  1. The local authority shall by 4pm on 3 August 2015 complete the CFAB referral form.

 

  1. The local authority shall by 4pm on 3 August 2015 contact Anne Scully or her colleague, working at the Delegated Central Authority under the Hague Convention Alberta Ministry of Human Services to enquire whether the Central Authority would agree for a local authority social worker employee or agent of the London Borough of Sutton to work in co-operation with Alberta Social Services to carry out a Home Study Report in respect of the sister in Canada, requesting a response by 4pm on 10 August.

 
 

  1. The Local Authority shall file its final evidence, final threshold and final care plan for the lad by 4.00pm on 20 November 2015. The local authority final evidence shall review and discuss all of the possible options for the lad and provide a balance sheet of all the advantages and disadvantages of each potential option.

 

  1. The local authority shall by 4.00pm on 20 November 2015 file and serve a statement setting out the efforts made to trace the father prior to the final hearing listed below.

 
 

  1. The Mother shall file and serve a position statement by 11am on 25 November 2015

 
 
 
 

6 Replies to “UK Govt “Snatches” Zimbabwean Boy From Mother”

  1. He is a useless uneducated spineless Shona savage !!! What are they doing in our country anyway? Kick the savages out back to their own country, they are filthy, corrupt and have forced our property prices down in the once live.y English villages that they mob!!! They destroyed their own country and now they come here and want to destroy ours! They are a scourge to society and we need to put a stop to this scourge once and for all!!!! We owe these savages nothing. I now understand why the white folk in Zimbabwe despise them with a passion!!!

  2. I’m really appalled by this story,and I really like the points you have raised here Masi.There is so many Zimbabwe mothers in UK whose children have been taken into care,and it’s all because they are single mothers in most cases.Also the fact that they are not allowed to publish their stories in the media,even social media.Also maybe because of our culture ,these mothers feel a bit of shame to even share their predicaments with others around them.I think this has to stop.The silence has to stop.The UK government had been taking advantage of these vulnerable mothers for a long time and get away with it in silence.In most cases they are just removing children on really petty ,rediculous and silly reasons.We as a Zimbabwean community we have to stand up tall and raise our voices on behalf of these mothers with children in care..We all know that the majority of these cases the mothers do no win in Family courts because the lawyers are useless and they work for the system.Most lawyers would only advice you to just comply with what the Local Authories are alleging and just sign the papers….I suggest something different and radical.Lets form an
    organisation whose role is of advocacy,advisory,and mediators between the local authority and the Zimbabwean mothers.In that way at least we can help these mothers by informing the UK local authorities about our cultural differences in raising and disciplining our children.

  3. Why is it that so many children are being forcefully and unfairly removed from the Zimbabwean families by the UK authorities and nothing is being done about it? Why is it that these families are suffering silently and not speaking out? What is the reason why the UK courts are restricting publication of such stories and imposing a media ban so that anyone mentioning the names of the affected families would be prosecuted? Is the aim to protect the impacted families or to ensure that these scandalous UK authorities actions in the name of child protection can continue unabated?

  4. With so many poor people, asylum seekers and destitute people in need of UK social services and financial support, how can the UK government use tax payers money to hire a lawyer in Canada for such a course. The boy has dual Canadian Zimbabwean citizenship and does not need all that support. And why is the UK trying to get the boy’s sister to adopt the son without first proving the mother is abusive? Why put so much effort into the sister adoption and not in getting the boy’s father and grandparents to start being responsible for the boy?
    Do you realize that only the papers from the local authorities and the court are being served on the father? There is no mention of the statements submitted by the mother. That goes to show how the UK authorities are operating. The voice of the mother does not matter. That is how the children are being forcefully removed from their parents in the UK and given up for adoption or ending up dying in homes, neglected and doing drugs.

Comments are closed.