ANALYSIS|Patson Dzamara has both an active and a passive role pre and post abduction of his brother Itai on the morning of the 9th March 2015. There are numerous trails of evidence pointing to his role in this whole fiasco which point to …. READ ON.
Following the publication of the first explosive Itai Dzamara article, I have been massively inundated with calls from people from all walks of life either in support or condemning the find[SEE- Dzamara Bro Has Top CIO Secret Numbers].
I also appreciate those who comprehend my views, opinion and questioning the whole issues around this abduction. I also understand those who are sympathetic and empathetic to the grieved family and are thus condemning the investigation which some have viewed as insensitive to Dr. Patson Dzamara.
Oncemore as I stated in the initial article, all I am trying to pursue is the truth. Here is a nation shocked and going about without answers to a spectacular abduction that takes place in broad daylight; yet chooses not to pursue any line of analysing the accusations made against the state agents, and the relationship between the accused and the brother Patson. We can not as a nation just accuse the lethargic state security and stop there, and forget about a missing human being. We are talking about a well known young man with friends and family who were also involved in his politics, or stood to benefit from it.
For me the question remains; who would benefit from Itai’s disappearance or death? I am basically working on assumptions as would most of you. And thus I believe the state would certainly not have benefited from this as we all know Itai was a mere activist whose actions posed no threat to the government or Zanu? Did his activism attract many followers? No. It came about when Zimbabweans had developed very cold feet regarding polical gathering. On the other hand, could some state agents have overzealously abducted him and something went horribly wrong?, possible. Of late we have seen a lot of immaturity in the conduct of mostly young state security operatives. They could have felt Itai was a tick on their job, and eager to please someone, acted against Itai. Zanu is also historically from the Gukurahundi era, if not the liberation struggle itself, well known for such abductions such that it is easy to blame it for anything. Outside the Gukurahundi era, many other individuals disappeared never to be seen again, or to be found dead; Guzha, Nleya, Nabayana, Phiri and many more.
Itai’s case revives their memories.
However, we should not cloud our thinking and forget other people can also do these acts and blame them on the state. In that case enter Patson Dzamara as Itai’s brother who is seen working with his brother’s alleged abductors to make money according to the allegations. Can we then close our eyes and stop questioning this great possibility which most Zimbabweans uphold at present especially at a time when Patson pays a blind eye to the allegations ?
But whichever way thoughts are deployed, Patson Dzamara has both an active and a passive role pre and post abduction of his brother Itai. There are numerous trails of evidence pointing to his role in this whole fiasco which point to nothing short of a blame. This series of articles is going to analyse and expose his actions as there is no African on earth who would sit wine and dine with the same people his family accuses of having taken the life of their beloved and all this soon after the bloody incident has occurred. Join me here on ZimEye.com and on Facebook for the next piece narrating how Patson betrayed his brother. ALSO READ – the first explosive Itai Dzamara article – “Dzamara Brother Has Top CIO Secret Numbers“.
Siyabonga!
Nhuku
3 Replies to “Itai Dzamara Betrayed By Own Brother”
Comments are closed.
the state agents also betray each other, behind the scenes that is. but seriously , is this that hard for you? lmao
In as much as you want to be “objective” Ndaba there is no such thing as truth that is independent of its speaker…. literally. Whatever you allege Itai’s brother’r role in the abduction was, he can only play that role as a peripherary figure benefiting from or simply exploiting state own complicity in the evil. In my own version of (situated) truth you will miss the point if you concentrate on Patson unless you can make him disclose the role of the state in the abduction
Having read this part I notice that you are not denying that the security agents are involved but you objectively point the fact that these state agents could have been helped by the victim’s brother. It is an objective analysis if Patson’s interactions with the state agents are true. Even during the Gukurahundi there were people who were showing state agents who to kidnap and kill. Some confessed afterwards. Wives betrayed their husbands. It would not be surprising that Patson is part of the murderer’s club, the one and only political organization= Zanupf. His name is Patson Dzamara yes but you say he betrayed his bother to the enemies. He did so as a Zanupf murderous machinery. It is the people that Itai Dzamara was against and they are Zanupf. Benefits or reasons are individually defined. Kidnapping and murdering political opponents in Zimbabwe is well known to be a Zanupf prerogative, culture, practice, attribute and character!