Dzamara Latest – Evidence Of Bitter Fighting Hrs Before Abduction
21 April 2015
Spread the love


The investigation into abducted activist Itai Dzamara’s disappearance has opened a can of worms amid revelations of bitter fighting between Dzamara and a group of his friends in the Occupy African Unity Square organisation.
This exclusive ZimEye.com investigation’s discovery reveals what the Police could have easily obtained as evidence in studying the man’s disappearance.
There are three peripheral points into this investigation and they are:  first of all digital footprints on the activist’s email, and social networking websites. Secondly there are witness statements from close friends who were with him before the abduction; and thirdly there are phone records before and after the incident.
This investigation looks into scuffles revealed through Dzamara’s official social networking portal hours before he disapparead.
*There is one unreported key matter on circumstances around Dzamara before his abduction and this discovery proposes that his friends utilised personal connections in the CIO to abduct him so to make him cough out money, a $200,000 cheque they claimed he had received from a US donor. This they wanted to at the least to share among themselves but were more concerned that Dzamara would spend the money on his own or with his Tsvangirai connections as he was now going onto provate meetings with the MDC-T leader . According to this investigation, when they failed to obtain access, the friends then utilised nefarious elements within the Central Intelligence Organisation to put Dzamara under pressure as according to an earlier find after he failed to release that money. Evidence of the $200,000 allegation, have been spotted in Whatsapp and email chats between a man (Name Withheld)  and A CIO agent working on Dzamara at the time.
There is strong evidence to support this proposition and this is seen in that late Friday afternoon barely three days before he was abducted, a furious colleague of his wrote on Facebook announcing to the rest of the OAUS group that Dzamara had been suspended for breaching the organisation’s code of conduct by jumping into bed with compromised individuals, referring to MDC-T leader Morgan Tsvangirai.
Soon after this allegation and the announcement were posted online, Dzamara would ascend to the forum a few hours later fighting back tooth and nail saying that no one can suspend him.
“This is a joke,” he announced.
That forum chat has since disappeared from the Facebook website, amid suspicion that the culprits did this on purpose to cover up for their crime.
However, the fight lasted into the late hours of Sunday nine hours before he disappeared.
The whole incident took place between Friday (night) the 6th March and Monday the 9th, the day of his abduction.
In the morning of Monday he was abducted outside a barber shop in Glen View and his disappearance was first announced by DARE party leader Gilbert Dzikiti who told ZimEye.com of the development.
Dzamara would retaliate saying that no one can stop him. “No amount of shouting, threats or attempts at mudslinging by some elements shall stop me from both calling for, and working towards, collaboration and unity of national players and stakeholders in fighting for a new Zimbabwe.
“In addition, we are not stopping rolling out action programmes, together with other players and in unity,” he said.
When contacted for a comment on this discovery, Dzamara’s brother, Patson ruled the whole investigation out saying Itai’s friends are too young to have done that.
“We looked into that dimension but nothing much to consider there. The young boys do not have the capacity to do that.”
But the first suspects on Dzamara’s abduction should essentially be his friends, this reporter contends due to the nature of bitter discourse and fighting just before the disappearance occurred.
Meanwhile Zimbabweans have speculated that Envoronment Minister Saviour Kasukuwere is behind the abduction. To date there is however no evidence to support this assertion.

26 Replies to “Dzamara Latest – Evidence Of Bitter Fighting Hrs Before Abduction”

  1. saka its true here kuti vakanetsana pamusoro pe $20 only nhai iwe dokuta dzamara?

  2. saka its true here kuti vakanetsana pamusoro pe $20 only nhai iwe dokuta dzamara?

  3. saka its true here kuti vakanetsana pamusoro pe $20 only nhai iwe dokuta dzamara?

  4. Matuzvi amai vako uri kuti anokara mari ndiyani when this story is very clear that vakarwira loot dzamara akatiza nayo

  5. Matuzvi amai vako uri kuti anokara mari ndiyani when this story is very clear that vakarwira loot dzamara akatiza nayo

  6. Matuzvi amai vako uri kuti anokara mari ndiyani when this story is very clear that vakarwira loot dzamara akatiza nayo

  7. munongoshandiswawo imi kunyora zvisina basa,your story lacks merit and will divert peoples focus on the real culprits ,this has happened before there was no 200k,the guy who purpoted to fire dzamara is not even part of the initial grouping ,

  8. munongoshandiswawo imi kunyora zvisina basa,your story lacks merit and will divert peoples focus on the real culprits ,this has happened before there was no 200k,the guy who purpoted to fire dzamara is not even part of the initial grouping ,

  9. munongoshandiswawo imi kunyora zvisina basa,your story lacks merit and will divert peoples focus on the real culprits ,this has happened before there was no 200k,the guy who purpoted to fire dzamara is not even part of the initial grouping ,

  10. At least there is mention of CIO and they are the ones who did it. Noone else has the capacity except notorious CIO. bring back Itai Dzamara now. Abducting someone over 200 000 dollars,stupid people who are hungry for money endai munoshande uko.Pfutseki.

  11. At least there is mention of CIO and they are the ones who did it. Noone else has the capacity except notorious CIO. bring back Itai Dzamara now. Abducting someone over 200 000 dollars,stupid people who are hungry for money endai munoshande uko.Pfutseki.

  12. At least there is mention of CIO and they are the ones who did it. Noone else has the capacity except notorious CIO. bring back Itai Dzamara now. Abducting someone over 200 000 dollars,stupid people who are hungry for money endai munoshande uko.Pfutseki.

  13. This story makes sense only if you do not know what was really going on. The person who ‘suspended’ Dzamara had no position to do so, having been ejected. It was a bitter lashing out after he had been disciplined due to bad behaviour. Further more, that person is completely unconnected to the others whom Itai was dealing with in terms of money.
    The 200 000 is a complete fabrication. The comrades had queries about a much smaller sum which had been used and accounted for. Their queries were responded to. It was a procedural matter that ruffled some feathers, but not the bitter fight described, and certainly not something to kidnap someone over. Further, as Dr Patson Dzamara said, none of the people involved have the capacity to oganize an abduction.
    The abduction was done by professionals in a manner seen before. These were security agents. They are and remain the prime suspects, anyone else is only involved peripherally. Any attempt to make a young activist the prime suspect is not only ridiculous, but perhaps malicious. It detracts from the most likely suspect.
    If someone stole something heavy, does it make sense to suspect the 12-year-old boy over the full-grown, muscular man?

  14. This story makes sense only if you do not know what was really going on. The person who ‘suspended’ Dzamara had no position to do so, having been ejected. It was a bitter lashing out after he had been disciplined due to bad behaviour. Further more, that person is completely unconnected to the others whom Itai was dealing with in terms of money.
    The 200 000 is a complete fabrication. The comrades had queries about a much smaller sum which had been used and accounted for. Their queries were responded to. It was a procedural matter that ruffled some feathers, but not the bitter fight described, and certainly not something to kidnap someone over. Further, as Dr Patson Dzamara said, none of the people involved have the capacity to oganize an abduction.
    The abduction was done by professionals in a manner seen before. These were security agents. They are and remain the prime suspects, anyone else is only involved peripherally. Any attempt to make a young activist the prime suspect is not only ridiculous, but perhaps malicious. It detracts from the most likely suspect.
    If someone stole something heavy, does it make sense to suspect the 12-year-old boy over the full-grown, muscular man?

  15. This story makes sense only if you do not know what was really going on. The person who ‘suspended’ Dzamara had no position to do so, having been ejected. It was a bitter lashing out after he had been disciplined due to bad behaviour. Further more, that person is completely unconnected to the others whom Itai was dealing with in terms of money.
    The 200 000 is a complete fabrication. The comrades had queries about a much smaller sum which had been used and accounted for. Their queries were responded to. It was a procedural matter that ruffled some feathers, but not the bitter fight described, and certainly not something to kidnap someone over. Further, as Dr Patson Dzamara said, none of the people involved have the capacity to oganize an abduction.
    The abduction was done by professionals in a manner seen before. These were security agents. They are and remain the prime suspects, anyone else is only involved peripherally. Any attempt to make a young activist the prime suspect is not only ridiculous, but perhaps malicious. It detracts from the most likely suspect.
    If someone stole something heavy, does it make sense to suspect the 12-year-old boy over the full-grown, muscular man?

  16. This the MOST DETAILED unbiased report ever, thank you Mr reporter. You have made clear why and how the CIO were involved. We shall find them chete
    mirai muone!!!

  17. This the MOST DETAILED unbiased report ever, thank you Mr reporter. You have made clear why and how the CIO were involved. We shall find them chete
    mirai muone!!!

  18. This the MOST DETAILED unbiased report ever, thank you Mr reporter. You have made clear why and how the CIO were involved. We shall find them chete
    mirai muone!!!

Comments are closed.